Suhrawardi's reason in explaining that Ibn Sina was unable to complete the project of "Oriental Wisdom" is that he was not aware of the "Oriental principle" which confirms the correctness of the title "Oriental".. Ibn Sina did not know this principle that had appeared to the wise men of Khosravani, which is the divine wisdom..
Our Sheikh writes:
"In ancient Iran, there was a nation that guided the truth and believed in the truth. These were virtuous sages who should not be confused with magi. I revived the noble wisdom of their light, which is also evidenced by Platonic taste and his predecessors, in the book Hikmat al-Ashraq, and no one has surpassed me in this matter.…
Abolghasem Kazroni writes:
"Just as Farabi was a reformer of the philosophy of Masha'i and therefore he was called the second teacher, Suhrawardi also revived the wisdom of the Eshraqis in his numerous books and treatises."
History of Islamic philosophy (Henry Carbone)
صص۲۶۳-۲۶۴
Translation: Dr. Javad Tabatabai
Hi
Regarding the criticism of the philosophy of enlightenment, "Illumination wisdom" or "Eastern wisdom" or "Khosravani wisdom" and the criticism of Carbon's view, it is better to refer to the article that Mr. Hassan Ansari posted on the historical review site..
Thanks