The nonsense and exaggeration of Herodotus and other ancient Greek historians
Curse on the evil evil Herodotus the liar
Emperor Napoleon said…
(( Regarding the flamboyant details of the Greek victories and the defeats of their countless enemies, it should not be forgotten that it is only the Greeks themselves who speak these words, and yet these words are useless, meaningless and extravagant, and that No Iranian chronicles have been written to confirm our judgments through a conflicting discussion.…))
(Memoirs of St. Helen-Napoleon Bonaparte)
…
It has been known for twenty-five centuries that Greek is ancient( Herodotus) It is vain and exaggerated, and even false and unbelieving, and all the writings of Oxafah are nonsense, and thus with the help of accurate examples we show that the chronicles of Herodotus and the writings of Catsias are much more full of historical facts than of historical facts. Myths are fabricated and false. Everyone knows that Herodotus is the one who wrote in his book of Chronicles:
…In this desert area and inside these sand dunes (India) Ants are found the size of a dog and in any case larger than a fox, which can actually be seen in the residence of the king of Iran.…!!!
Chronicles of Herodotus-Book III-Clause 102
And also Herodotus wrote:
…Each of the camel's hind legs consists of 2 Thigh and 2 It is the knee…!!!
Chronicles of Herodotus-Book III-Clause 103
And also wrote:
…All the Indians I talked about mingle in public and in front of other people…The semen of an Indian man is not white but black like the color of his skin…!!!
Chronicles of Herodotus-Book III-Clause 101
And now let's listen to the ridiculous legends of Katsias:
…The historian Ctesias has described a spring that is filled with molten gold every year and a hundred jars are filled with it every year.… He also talked about the iron found at the bottom of the spring. Ketsias claims to have had two swords made of this metal.…
It says about this sword that if it is hit on the ground, it will stop the flood, hail, hail and storm.…!!! Ctesias even claims that Xerxes did it twice before his eyes…!!! Ctesias reported that in central India there are black people who are called dwarfs but whose penises are so long that they hang down to their ankles.…!!!
Judge for yourself how valuable the writings of Herodotus and Catsias and other Greek historians are ???
Anyone who knows the history of Greece should also know that Athens, Sparta and Thebes did not reach solidarity with each other as much as they were friends and associates of Susa and Sardis and the Persian Empire.. Go and read the history of the Peloponnesian wars by Thucydides and see how the Athenians and Spartans, who were the same country, massacred each other with hatred..
Anyone who has read the history of Greece should also know that the hatred and hatred of Greece towards the great king and his country was much less than the hatred and hatred that the Athenians and Spartans had towards each other. Who reads the history of Greece should know that where and as long as the interests, ambition, treachery and corruption of several Greek leaders did not provoke the Greeks against the Persians, the Ionian Greeks and the inhabitants of the Greek islands under the flag And under the shadow of the rulers of Susa, they were much happier and freer, and these are the truths that are revealed only when a person frees himself from Athenian bias and propaganda and faces the truth.. Whenever a person can free himself from the shackles of legends and false stories of Herodotus, Ctesias and Isocrates, he can reach the historical truth..
These are the ones who have seen the Peloponnesian battle and the peace of Nicias, have witnessed the destruction of the Athenian army against Syracuse, and have seen the alliance of Sparta with Iran.. They have understood both the surrender of Athens and the peace of Antalkidas, and the peace of Philocrates and the defeat of Chronia, without ever understanding the lessons of history.. The bad luck and the problem is that they have not understood anything about history… Goodbye
Don't take Herodotus seriously like this, he knows how to lie, for example, he wrote the story of Cyrus' birth in such a way that even a goat can understand that it is a lie and it is all a myth.
One of the important and basic topics in the history of Ariana is the discussion of the Achaemenid dynasty and Alexander's war with the king of Iran.
Many western colonial orientalists from the nineteenth century onwards, in order to make the history of Ariana and India empty and meaningless and to discard its originality and antiquity, neglected the ancient historical sources of Sindh, Balkh and Sistan and often the history of this area and The ancient kings wrote it based on ancient Greek sources and inscriptions and translated and interpreted the inscriptions based on experimental science and presented them as a definitive and infallible document..
Although stone inscriptions may reflect a small part of the history of countries, the main and important issue is whether dumb and ambiguous stone inscriptions, alone and without other clues and evidence, can be a solid and reliable foundation and reflect the entire history, culture, language, How many thousand-year-old ancestry, customs and traditions of a land and its people and kings should be placed? What is the assurance that these inscriptions are all original or that they have been translated and interpreted in an impartial and non-political way?
One of the cases whose history is written based on ancient Greek sources and inscriptions is the Achaemenid dynasty.. Probably, the name of Achaemenid was mentioned for the first time by English Rawlinson.
Rawlinson was one of the four Assyrians of the Kingdom of London and an English official at the court of the Iranian government. [1] Rawlin Son, who was the British military envoy, for the first time in the years 1835 until the 1837 He visited Biston inscription in Kermanshah. he head do in 1267 Q/ 1858 M. succeeded in reading its ancient Persian text.[2]
Also, as far as the author knows, the first foreign book that mentions Achaemenid is the History of Herodotus, and probably the History of Herodotus was first published by Rawlinson with an introduction..
French Domorgan (1857 – 1924 M) and Rawlinson (1858 M) And Fraser Teitler and Richard Frey, who were all Englishmen, and Noldeke, a German Jew, and Barthold, a Russian German, as well as Hertesfeld, Stronach, and Grishman, who were all Jews, and Darmstetter, a Frenchman, and Cohen, Schmidt, and Schurman, and a number of others, are among those. which have more or less played a role in the creation of modern history for Afghanistan and Iran.
During the first and second Pahlavi era, the French Domorgan and his team 65 They were engaged in writing history in Demargan Castle in Susa. The Englishman Rawlinson was the first person who read the Biston inscription of Kermanshah and extracted Achaemenid and Dariush Achaemen from it.. Also, Stronach, Grishman, and Herzfeld built the forty minarets and the thousand-pillared castle of Queen Huma of Balkhi and the Temple of Solomon from the materials and stone foundations, and from the remains of the Zoroastrian fire temple, Persepolis and Pasargad, the tomb of Achaemenid Cyrus, the Kaaba of Zoroaster, and stone inscriptions in Shiraz..
Although, on the other hand, we consider ourselves indebted to Western archaeologists; But on the other hand, when we closely examine and study the falsehoods and undocumented and contradictory assumptions of a group of them about the history of the people of the East, we are very sorry that our people and some of our researchers did not reflect and pay attention to the ancient texts and sources. Arab, Persian, and Turkish scholars have put absolute faith and trust in the modern creations of a group called archaeologists or orientalists..
From the 19th century onwards, these hypothesists colluded with the courts of Tehran and Kabul and by writing collusive history and with their modern creations called science and academia, they ridiculed the people of Iran and Afghanistan and played with their intelligence and history..
I hope I will not be accused of harshness and prejudice. If you also examine the ancient Vedic and Avestan texts and Arabic, Persian and Turkish sources of the Islamic period on the one hand, and the assumptions and speculations of these Orientalists on the other hand, or if you only examine the collection of reflective books on the foundation of Iranian history called "Twelve Centuries of Silence" " and watch the documentary called "Magnificent Objects" by Nasser Pour Pirar, you will no doubt agree with me, and you will see with your own eyes that a number of Western Orientalists such as Stronach, Grishman and Herzfeld in the year 1318 What have they not done in building Persepolis, Pasargad, Achaemenid Cyrus's tomb, Zoroaster's Kaaba and forging stone inscriptions in Shiraz?.
The creators of Achaemenid history, based on the Torah (؟) And the ancient sources of ancient Greece and the Bistun inscription of Kermanshah mention the Achaemenid dynasty, Cyrus and Darius Achaemenid as the historical kings of Iran; But the Shahs of Pishdadi and Kayani, Balkhi and Zabali, and the undeniable era of Mehri and Parsi – Especially the very bright period of Kayanian, Avesta and Zoroaster- are called legends and stories. The period in which time, place, language and religion, which are the pillars of history, are clearly mentioned. Kayaniani, who are mentioned in detail in all ancient texts such as Avesta, Pahlavi texts and Shahnamehs, all Arabic and Persian sources of the Islamic period, and dozens of cities and ancient places in Balkh, Zabul and Kabul are named after them..
From the pioneer Iranian historians Mr. Mirza Hasan Khan Pirnia ( 1309 Sh) and Dr. Purdaud (The first Persian translator of Avesta and a professor at Tehran University, 1305) They are probably one of the first ones who proposed the Achaemenids, Cyrus, and Darius I, II, and III as a separate royal dynasty instead of the Kians.[3]
The 100-page history book called "Ancient Iran" written by Mr. Mirza Hassan Khan Pirnia is perhaps one of the first books that officially mentions Achaemenids as historical kings and Pishdadians and Kayans as fictional ones..
The book mentioned for the first time in a year 1309 called "Old Iran" and twice a year 1341 It is called "Ancient Iran" in pocket and three times a year 1370 It is called "Ancient Iran" in one larger volume and the last one is called "Ancient Iran" in three large volumes, which are about two thousand pages in total..
The writings and sources of ancient Greeks such as Herodotus and… And the writings of Iranian researchers about the history of the Achaemenid dynasty are very inadequate, dumb and vague, confused and shaky..
One) Dr. Shirin Bayani, professor of history at Tehran University, writes: One of the most important features of the history of ancient Iran and especially the history of the Achaemenids is that the Iranians did not leave any historical writings.. It shows that oral traditions have been very popular in the land of Iran. Therefore, today's researcher has to resort to the writings of writers from other lands, especially Greek and Roman writers, to understand the history of Iran.. Although the picture of Iran given by these writers is often simplistic and biased, it is possible to shed light on some of the dark corners of Iran's history by studying, examining and looking critically at the writings of these writers. .[4]
two) Will Durant: "It seems that the Medes, during their migrations, passed through Bukhara and Samarkand, and from these areas, they gradually moved towards the south and settled there after reaching Pars.. In Akbatan, the first king Ishan Diaco built his first capital and decorated it with a royal palace, which dominated the city and had an area of nearly two square kilometers.. According to the story in the book of Herodotus - but another story does not confirm it, this hurried government did not find an opportunity to make a great contribution to the building of civilization; Not a single piece of stone or a letter has been left from the literature and art of this people."[5]
Three) Dehkhoda's dictionary about "Pasargad" and "Anzan" and the Achaemenid dynasty and the lineage of Cyrus, Dariush, Khashayarshah, Cheshpash, Kabujieh and… He gave explanations and wrote on completion: "This is according to the list made by the late Pirnia in ancient Iran, but European researchers have objections to it. There is no correct answer to the question of when the Achaemenid dynasty began in Pars. [6]
four) Mr. Henry Mase: Cyrus and his successors, who were descendants of Achaemenid, created a great empire that stretched from the Nile to Turkestan.. This empire fell into the hands of Alexander the Great two years after its establishment.[7]
The writer doesn't know those who, by proposing such loose opinions and shaky words, about Achaemenid and Kushan culture and history.- Hayatele and the thousands of years of history and civilization of "India and Aryan" with pomp, how come they constantly quote foreigners in their writings and do not mention any of their native sources? Isn't this a sign of their vanity and forgery?
It is clear to everyone that a significant part of the Avesta and Pahlavi texts and all Shahnamehs before Ferdowsi and the two third Shahnamehs of Ferdowsi are the history and stories of the Pishdadi and Kiani periods of Bamiyan and Balkh, the geographical and ethnic names of Zabulistan and Kabulistan, and the stories of the Sam and Zal families. And Rostam, Yalan and Zabeli wrestlers form. If this part of Avesta and Pahlavi texts and Shahnamehs are legends, then something called Ariana or ancient Iran must also be legend.. Because the name of Ariana or ancient Iran is inextricably mixed with the kings of Pishdadi, Kiani and with the names of Bamiyan, Balkh, Zabul and Kabul..
We ask these Achaemenidians of the 19th century, if the ancestors of the Vakyans, with so many thousands of years of history and myths, with so many sayings and hadiths, poetry and poetry, and with so many works and evidences, such as the palaces and cemeteries in Balkh, Sistan and Zabulistan, And with all these living families in Baghlan, Pakistan, Zabul, and Mashhad, Iran… If they are legends, how can the new and emerging Achaemenians, who rely only on the words of an Englishman named Rawlinson, be certain historical facts? The Achaemenians, about whom the ancient Vedic and Avestan texts, the Pahlavi sources of the Sassanid and Islamic periods, the Persian and Arabic sources of the Islamic period, and even the sources and dictionaries of the Safavid and Qajar periods had no information about them.. Achaemenians, about whom there is not a single line of local legend or a verse of poetry or a verifiable work in the entire Eastern region.. Achaemenians, today, not even a small family can be found by their name in the whole world. Achaemenians, who have neither a proven time, nor religion, language, and their place are clear and clear.
How is it possible that all these thousands of years old sources, and all these ancient works in Balkh, Samangan, Kabul, Ghorband, Bamyan, Jalalabad, Sistan, Kandahar and… as much as the writings of ancient Greeks such as Herodotus and… Or do they not have as much scientific value and historical validity as the new speculations of Western orientalists in the nineteenth century? While people asked God's prophets for miracles and proofs, is it unreasonable for us to ask these academic claimants for proofs, proofs, and witnesses? Although these opinions have come from academic centers such as Cambridge and Oxford and from university professors. Do 20th century orientalists know the names of the ancestors of the eastern people better than their own ancestors?
One of our most important problems is that we have become very Westernized and optimistic, and the name of the West and its amazing scientific and civil developments dazzle our eyes and we are faced with names such as orientalist, archaeologist, western university, western researchers, professor, scholar , academician and… We have surrendered very early and considered what was inculcated to us from western universities in English in the name of scientific history as scientific, academic and inviolable, and we accept it without reflection..
From none of the ancient Sanskrit Vedic, Avesta, Pahlavi and Greek sources, it is not clear that the dynasty named Achaemenid, Cyrus and Darius Achaemenid, who were the kings of a country called Iran, had a foreign existence..
Also, in all Persian and Arabic chronicles and dictionaries of the Islamic period, and in no divan of Persian poetry dating back seventy years, and in all Shahnamehs and Ferdowsi's Shahnameh, the word Achaemenid is not found..
Islamic pioneer historians such as Tabari, Balami, Hamza Esfahani, Masoudi, Ibn Athir, Ibn Khaldun and… The Achaemenians are not mentioned.
In ancient cultures like: The culture of decisive argument (Old lithography) Rashidi culture (old print) and their culture (India edition) And other cultures seven decades ago, there are no words like Achaemenid, Cyrus, and Darius. However, Koresh is mentioned in Rashidi and Nafisi's literature, but he is interpreted as King Khosrow of Iran. [8]
There is no mention of Alexander's war with Darius the Achaemenid in any of the chronicles of the Islamic period. In the history books of Alexander and in all the chronicles of the Islamic period, the name of the king of Iran or Persia during Alexander's attack is mentioned as "Dara bin Dara Kiani", not Darius Achaemenid.[9]
Professor Abdul Razzaq Kanpuri read and wrote the Achaemenid dynasty as Kiani: "Abul Hasan Masoudi (Fourth century) and Ferdowsi (The fifth century) They believe that the name of the Achaemenid family was originally Kiani, and in the Greek language it is "E. Of. may. straw. They used to pronounce it… According to Iranian and Arab historians, Kayanian Madd 570 Or 718 Sal, according to national legends, they reigned in Iran, and their records are available to this day in the stone inscriptions of Mount Bistun and Naqsh Rostam. [10]
The result is that: Achaemenians except Kayanians and Achaemenian Cyrus, except Ki Khosrau Kiani and Darius I and II Achaemenis, except having the first and second Kiani, is an unprovable statement, and there is no doubt that the Bistun mountain inscription, which is known today as the Achaemenian inscription, is the same Kianimei inscription.
References
[1] cf. To: Dehkhoda Dictionary, Rawlin Sen.
[2] Big Persian encyclopedia / To the dictionary of Dehkhoda / Musaheb's Farsi encyclopedia, sub-bistoon / Ganj Danesh, historical geography of Iranian cities, p 310 also refer.
[3] Nick: Dr. Pordawood, Yashta / 2/ p. 213./ Mirza Hasan Pirnia, Ancient Iran, Volume 1, p. 624 onwards.
[4] Iran and the Ancient East in the Historical Library, p 7
[5] Will Durant, History of Civilization Vol 1 pg. 406
[6] Dehkhoda, under Achaemenid. And also to the period of Ancient Iran Pirnia and Dr. Purdawood, Yashta / 2/ صص 337- 338 See also.
[7] Henry Mase, Iranian civilization, several Orientalists, translated by Dr. Issa Behnam, p 40
[8] Farhang Rashidi written by Abdol Rashid Madani Tatavi, Vol. 4, p. 2858 / How ancient/ Farhang Nafisi, written by Dr. Ali Akbar Nafisi (Regulating doctors)
[9] cf: Van Van Broeck, History of Iskandar Kabir, p. 34, translated and compiled by Mohammad Ali Khan Foroughi, 1315, Tehran
[10] Professor Mohammad Abdul Razzaq Kanpuri (Hindi) Barmakian, translated by Tabatabai and Ram. e. Podraga, p. 12
In the books of Zabih A… Mansouri, like Sarzemin Javid, has used a lot of evidence and research about historical events, and it is compatible with historical logic. Both of you's words are clever in many places. For example, in the praise of Cyrus, he said it was good, but the reality of history and research shows the same, but in the battle of Marathon, he lied that history will change, otherwise, if he did not say whether Cyrus was good or bad, nothing about the performance of that great nerd will change the history, present and future of the world.
Pan-Iranists and Pan-Persians use and quote Herodotus wherever it suits them, and they slander when it is against them.
Hello. Herodotus is not a Greek historian, because ancient Greece did not exist. He was from a region near present-day Syria. That is, an Assyrian.. Enmity of the Assyrians(who are one of the Iranian tribes)It cannot be denied with other Iranian ethnic groups. The important thing is that everything related to the history of Iran is shamelessly mentioned in the name of a country where you cannot even find a piece of brick that is more than 2500 years old.
I'm sure you read history. Ancient Greece didn't exist, where did you get it from? Assyrians are Semitic people, not Iranians, great historians.
If ancient Greece did not exist, then the Achaemenians are also Alkis, because most of the history of Achaemenid Iran was at war with Greece, what are you saying?
Of course, friends, I myself am a fan of Achaemenians. I wrote this to answer Mr. A.A
Yes, leave people like you alone, tomorrow you will talk about Iran's history 1400 It's a year old, go to the book “History 10 A thousand years of Iran” read the. Herodotus was biased in some places, of course, but there is no reason to question all of his history. The writings of world history are owed to the Greeks, apart from the wars they had, and it must be accepted that the Greeks were very brave people. , especially the Spartans. I am Lek, and there is a cave in our city of Kuhdasht 12 It is a thousand years old and its paintings are still standing. Our history 7 It is not even a thousand years, it is more than these words!!!
Are you afraid of Iran's history or the fact that 32 letters of the Persian language owes 28 letters to Arabic? I don't know what you are proud of. This is your history from Herodotus. If you add up your entire history, it won't be three thousand years, I don't know how you got it to seven thousand years. Before your illusionary blindness, there was another invisible kingdom.
You said very nonsense, you don't know what history is at all. Where did you read in history that you write like this?. You don't know that many Arabic words have been taken from Persian and other Fayrian languages and have been Arabicized. You are weaving unmeasured yarns, this is about Iran's history and that's it. I doubt you even know your date of birth. So far, the age of human civilization in Iran has reached more than seven thousand years. By civilization, I mean urban civilization. Otherwise, in many parts of Iran, works of ten thousand years, fifteen thousand years, and even thirty thousand years old have been found.. You must be very illiterate and uncultured to say this
Go away, you are even worse than Herodotus, at least Herodotus has spoken the truth in some places, and I doubt that a single word that is not a lie has ever crossed your mind.
Well, what did your Arab ancestors invent Arabic script, syntax and grammar??
An Iranian is the first inventor of syntax and grammar and diversification of the Arabic language.
Bobsher Siboyeh is another pride of Pars province, which is the grammar and syntax (grammar) He invented the Arabic language.
Mrs. Zare, professor of Arabic language and literature, Shiraz University :
…..It was the Iranians who used grammar and syntax for the Arabs (Grammar) they wrote.
Source :
https://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/5099450
Well, dear friend, first, you should do a short research about the origin of the Persian script and the Arabic script of your mother tongue so that you don't get lost like this.?
This script we write with is Persian script, which Arabs will copy later, please do some research
Greetings, you have not seen the good writings of this great historian, because in many of his writings, he admitted the greatness of Iranians and their kings and mentioned them well, so don't hit Sorena with his wide mouth and look at all aspects of the work together.
Yes, according to Mrs. Atusa, later they will say that Ferdowsi was a liar, with these terrible interpretations that you made of Herodotus, we can really fear that the future generations will (A thousand years later)Ferdowsi is called a great liar because of his myths and poems describing imaginary myths such as Rostam, but he is unaware that Ferdowsi's method of historiography is unique in the form of poetry and myths and is valuable, storytelling and myth-telling of the interests of the people of the time. Lands and lands, what can be understood from the history of Herodotus is his unique and prose style, not the vulgarity and lowliness that you said, and I myself have repeatedly admitted that what he has said is the result of what he has heard from the people of the lands and never all writings Hashu did not confirm, but these Iranian and Aryan claimant friends opened their mouths to obscenity with words far from civilization and exhumed this poor father, God forbid the day when the great Ferdowsi perishes in this unhealthy way
Later they say that Ferdowsi was a liar. Greetings to my country, Iran
Hello, I am also of Aryan descent. I had a question. Some of my friends say that the Kurds were in Iran before the Aryans came. Is this true? I did not do it myself, I asked out of curiosity
Goodbye
* We assume that the Kurds are a tribe from the Maadi tribes*
No, the Aryan tribes have migrated to Iran
According to the theory, the Aryans have settled in Iran from the very beginning
In the Chronicles of Herodotus, it is mentioned that first the Medes took over the government and formed a unified central government, and the Persians were always mentioned along with this government.
We did not find out whether Herodotus was an exaggeration or not.
Wherever we like it, we refer to it, wherever we say no, it was a hangover!!
Hello
Herodotus was born to parents who are neither Greek nor Eastern, with a unique name and relative set .
Research on Herodotus does not succeed because those who destroyed all the books and antiquities of Greece, Iran and Egypt and instead created new stories, works and history for these countries. . Everything about this author has been destroyed .
Many things can not be said because there is no evidence, but you can understand. It is better to think and think about our present life and our only source is the Qur'an, the word of God and authentic hadiths. Think to ourselves why after several thousand years Iranians and their ancestors have become important to everyone Berley Turks Arabs and the West and 100 of course for Zionism !? Well, if you review these cases again, you will see that these countries are in some way fighting with the politics, soil, or religion of Iranians, so let's be vigilant and not undermine the unknown past so much and let's not let our today become the unknown tomorrow of our futures..
It's good that you became a guiding light in the darkness of the night, otherwise we will all be lost forever . We do not know
Then, how do you consider your statements to Herodotus to be valid? With what resources?
As history has shown, extremist theologians have historically destroyed the relics of great civilizations.
You/:Why do we think that after several thousand years, Iranians and their ancestors have become important to everyone?
It may not have been important for religious people throughout history, but it is important for Iranians who have passed away!!! If not, it is definitely not Iranian!!! Otherwise, if the past didn't matter to Iranians, they wouldn't be Iranians after seven thousand years! And we were part of the Arab double (Of course, it does not suit your mood) Remember that the name Iran ( It means the land of Aryans)
Pon, you said that we will not overturn the past anymore and we will listen to your order until you order ….
I have a question, you don't want to destroy the past, so what were you doing here?
Be a true seeker!
Goodbye
Mr. Shamshad, forgive me for being arrogant and giving the answer to this servant of God, but the description of the current state of people who talk about religion and preach constantly is from Hafez's mouth.:
Preachers show off in the altar and pulpit/because they go to private places, they do other things
I have a problem with the scientist of the Majlis
It's as if they don't believe that there will be a day of judgement
Mr. Aliens, according to Mr. Khorasani, we should doubt that you are Iranian(Once I had become a friend with a servant of God to some extent, and then I saw that the other side was saying bad things about Ferdowsi.)Or are you one of those people who tarnish not only one country, but the world, and on the other hand, with my words, you made a new and desirable religion for yourself, and you are also tarnishing the face of religion in the eyes of others. Dear, freedom in thinking, but you have no right to insult a nation.
By the way, your words have been easily rejected in religious books, because you claim to be very religious and you must be very Hussein Hussein.(However, for myself, I am proud of a lord like Imam Hussein) Definitely a book “The life of Imam Hussain” Read the guide and the section related to Nahavand war by Zain al-Abidin to see if this glorious past is unknown or not?
Also, try to investigate through religious books, especially the interpretations of the Qur'an, who Dhu al-Qarnayn was..
درود
Saeed Jan is one of your magnanimity
I just said my personal opinion
Sincerely
So what is written about Cyrus or other kings is also wrong???
If this is the case, half of our history is considered to be nothing more than their nonsense, and the enemies of Iran and Cyrus point out that it is nonsense.
Peace be upon a true patriot
They made this mistake in order to make the world more visible
Otherwise, what did the Roman people know about the world?
They did not put the meter in their hands
Curse on these liars
Herodotus recited a lot of nonsense: This is an example :
In order to make the victory of Khashai Arsha Brivananian's dream army look dim, he considers it to be the superiority of Iranians and said that the Pars army was 20 million people who defeated them from one side of the gate to the other side of the gate. The Greek pawns have beaten Razizpalgad!Maybe it's not bullshit and this one is true!
The professors of the University of Chicago in America, Ernest Herzfeld and Girshman, in exploring the ancient hills of Susa, found out that the army of Xerxes had 250,440,000 men, and Herodotus was grateful for himself.!
Hello. That's right. Herodotus lied a lot about the Persians and their glorious empire, especially the reign of Xerxes the Great, because of his fear and hatred of the Persians and Xerxes.. I have said it hundreds of times and I will say it again: Curse on the evil evil Herodotus the liar
Greetings to the pure honor of Iranianness and Aryanity, it was really beautiful
Greetings dear friend, thank you for reading the article and commenting and I am glad that you are satisfied. Don't be rude, consider me your younger friend, I suggest you try to use Persian words as much as possible. (At least in your writings) It's a pity beautiful and heartwarming words (Iran) And (Aryan) Shouldn't they be used with Arabic grammar and lose their beauty? You could see it like this : Salutations to the pure Iranian and Aryan nature, indeed it was beautiful… Forgive me for my arrogance… Thank you again… Goodbye
If I am not mistaken, Homer was also one of the Greek historians who wrote history during the period when Odysseus was the king of Ithaca. . Did Homer lie and exaggerate like Herod?
Yes, dear Hossein, Homer also has some writings, but the volume of his writings is not that large, and because most of the city, songs, and stories of the writings are open, it can be attributed to his poetic feelings, but this Herodotus is filthy and full of things that he wrote under the title of true history. He gave it to the world. A curse on Herodotus. I will repeat this sentence as long as I live. A curse on Herodotus, the evil, filthy, liar.
The famous geographer Strabo writes: Ancient poets like Homer and Hesiod can be trusted more than Herodotus and other historians of the Old Testament. Of course, if there are mistakes in some places, it is the fault of the person from whom Herodotus got the information, because his work method was mostly based on the oral statements of contemporaries of the events. One of the interesting things that shows the degree of authenticity and trustworthiness of his writings is the mention of the names of the participants in Darius the Great's coup d'état, so that the author only misspelled the name of one of those coup plotters, and of course, in that case, the name of one of his close relatives. and he has mentioned the associates of Darius. In general, Herodotus was an outstanding writer, although he introduced some legends, the Imam should know that at that time, everyone did this, and he was no exception to this rule..
If you are looking for an author who has stated all the facts to “you did” Refer to who is called the father of scientific history because he analyzes history based on the role of cause and effect without including gods in it..