Nasser Porpirar Farman Rawai Oham(1)

A reflection on the historical basis of Nasser Pourpirar's writings :

It is not too late that a collection of books with the general title ( A reflection on the history of Iran ) The work of a writer named Mr. Nasser Pourpirar has entered the publishing market of the country . The books that the reader reads through their pages with the author's claim that the entire history of several thousand years of the people of this land will be immortalized, which is now in academic and university centers all over the world as a matter of course; It is accepted and taught to be fake and hand-made by Jews and Shuabiyyah … May be met with . But unfortunately, despite the fact that the respected author calls everyone to reflect on the foundation of Iran's history, there is less sign of reflection and thinking worthy of the name of the book as well as the person who calls himself a historian. . Therefore, in this article, it is decided to give a fair critique and away from the prejudices, racist and chauvinistic opinions about his opinions. . And of course, it should be mentioned that the author did not decide to take such action after such a short period of time since the establishment of this website, but the messages of some friends who have thoughts similar to Mr. Porpirar's thoughts made the author take early action in this regard. case forced . And with the grace of God and the help of friends, I will write more about this in the future . With such a brief introduction, we will enter the main valley under discussion .
Some signs of lack of reflection and thinking in book editing:
Mr. Porpirar wrote the book in the first three centuries of Islam and of course all the writings in the book( index) They think it is a fake of Shoubiyyah( A bridge to the past, first part, pp. 145-228) And he considers the names of scientists and writers mentioned to be lies and considers the non-mention of Ibn Nadim's name in the book of the history of Baghdad as a proof of his claim. ( The same, p. 163) . But it is interesting that he is not at all about the book(Defining the classes of nations) Posted(Andalusian rising judge) which contains the history of scientists and science until the end of the fifth century of Hijri and was written in the late fifth century and the beginning of the sixth century of Hijri and contains similar contents to the list, it does not say anything . And the surprise is that the author of the book was of Arab origin and a relative of the Umayyad dynasty of Andalusia! ; Despite being an Arab, has he been a supporter of Shoubayan and has done something for their interests? For the reasoned and documented rejection of Mr. Porpirar's claims regarding the non-writing of the book on the first century of Islam, examples of the book on the classification of the nations are given as evidence. . In his book, Qazi Saed al-Andalsi talks about the fate of Ahwazi and attributes the translation of a book about astronomy from Pahlavi to Gharbi to him. ( Introducing the Classes of Nations, p 157)And Abu Zakaria Yohanna Ibn Masawiyah as a physician in the late 2nd and early 3rd century and the author of books (leprosy ) ، ( phlebotomy ) And ( Cupping) He teaches( The same, p. 191) . Wabul Abbas introduces Fazl bin Hatem Nirizi as the author of the book Commentary on Majisti in 3rd Hijri. (The same, p. 226) And he introduces Musa bin Shakir as an Iranian and a teacher and author of numerous geometry books and an astronomer at Mamun's court ( The same, p. 225)And Abu al-Abbas Ahmad bin al-Tayyib Sarkhsi, who in the year 218 Hijri is born is introduced by the author of fifty-four books and treatises on philosophy and the student of Yaqub Ibn Ishaq Kennedy. .( The same, p. 207) . Now, the question that comes to mind is whether Mr. Porpirar was really not aware of the existence of such a book or did he deliberately forget it?
Mr. Porpirar, on the other hand; Abu Hanifa Nu'man bin Thabit introduces the Grand Imam of the Sunnis, who is mentioned in the chronicles as Iranian, and whose followers make up at least half of the Muslims today, as a liar and an illusion, and a person who never had a historical existence. ! Really, was it possible for the Shoubians to gain so much power that they make a false leader and the majority of Muslims follow the religious orders of a leader who did not exist? Considering the fact that the majority of Hanafis in the world are non-Persians and mostly of Arab descent and are opposed to the Shuabis !
The respected author of the 12th century of silence also assumes that Iskandar is the same as Dhul-Qarnain mentioned in the Quran and the verses of Surah Mubaraka Kahf. . But their citation goes back to the historical books of Muslims, especially the Iranians of the early Hijri centuries, who introduced Alexander to Dhul-Qarnin.( The same books that they say were mostly written by Shuabiyyah and most of them have nothing to offer except lies.) Or to the contents of the books written by the Greeks and Romans about Alexander, but the reader, who has made thinking and reflection his profession according to his invitation, when you provide the contents of those books about Alexander without the slightest documented reason. introduces, but calls their talk about the Achaemenid, Parthian, and Sassanid dynasties as absolute fakes. . Is it really possible to consider Iskandar as the same as Zulqarnain? Is it possible to consider Alexander, who according to the same dates cited by him sacrificed to Sun Zeus for many gods, with Dhul-Qarnain of the Holy Qur'an, who believes that all matters are due to God's grace?
On the other hand, Mr. Porpirar does not attach importance to any of the dates left from the ancient times and does not even mention them, and only mentions the book of Herodotus, which he thinks is fake and commissioned and written on the orders of Ardeshir, and its contents. He considers it more worthless than coffee shop movers( The rise of the Achaemenians, p. 136) It is enough . But it is interesting that in some places this book cites what it believes to be false, and sometimes despite quoting it, it cleverly refers to another source. . As an example, when he talks about the types of government after the coup of Dariush and other Persians against Samardis, he quotes it from the book History of the Achaemenid Empire written by Briyan.(The rise of the Achaemenians, p 239) . But it is interesting to mention that the only first-hand source that has informed about this is the book of Herodotus, and Briyan himself quoted such information from the book of Herodotus. . How can this action be interpreted?
And surprisingly, they consider the Achaemenians to be a Slavic race(The rise of the Achaemenians, p. 214) And they call Zoroaster a prophet who never existed(The Rise of Achaemenians, pp. 131-135) . But it is interesting that in order to prove that the Achaemenids were Slavonjads and their migration from the steppes of Russia, he mentions the Zoroastrian tradition that fire is sacred and claims that fire is a necessity for life in Russia due to the severe cold and that is why the Achaemenids used it. Over time, they considered it sacred, because in the south of Iran, the heat is excruciating, and considering fire as sacred is not consistent with this heat.!( Bramden Achaemenian, footnote p 243) ! Can't it be said in the same way of Mr. Porpirar's reasoning that now that they have accepted the sacredness of fire, they must necessarily believe that the air, air and soil are also sacred among Zoroastrians and Achaemenians? And because there was plenty of water in the steppes of Russia and there was a lack of water in the southern regions of Iran, this lack of water, which is the necessity of life, has caused its sanctity among the Achaemenians, and therefore they originated from the south of Iran? And it is even more interesting that in another place, despite their claim that the Achaemenians are of Slavic descent, he introduces them as one of the tribes of the Israelites. . (Ibid., p 179)
On the other hand, Ashurbani considers Assyrian Shah Pal as a distinguished cultural figure because of the library they built, and for this reason, he considers him to be famous for the barbarities mentioned in his inscription. !(The rise of the Achaemenians, p 75) But if he did not forget on purpose and uses his memory, he should know that there were many people in history who built libraries and did public works. But they will never be forgiven for their crimes . For example, Mahmoud Ghaznavi; He made his capital the scientific center of those days, and he did not build libraries and schools there( History of the Schools of Iran, pg. 92) . But what about him who invaded India 17 times and that too just to get wealth? Can this be considered barbarism for this reason? Timur Lang is another example of these barbarians, the people of Isfahan and Sabzevar … They still remember the minarets decorated with the heads of their fellow citizens and by the order of Timur, while the same Timur made his capital Samarkand one of the largest scientific centers in the world.(History of Timurids and Turkomans, p. 65) Mr. Porpirar should answer, should Timur Raniz be considered a distinguished person in the field of science, literature and culture?
And the most surprising thing is that Mr. Porpirar, in his book The Rise of the Achaemenians, considers the burning of Takht Jamshid as the answer to the flames of Athens.( The rise of the Achaemenians, p 254) But in the first part of his Sasanian book, which was published without permission, but is freely sold. ! He claims that no trace of fire can be found anywhere in Takht Jamshid (Sassanian, Pishinehey Narasti, p 289 ) Of course, one can find many such contradictions in all of their books . Just like his claim in the book The Rise of the Achaemenians that it is wrong to call the people of Mesopotamia Arab. ( The rise of the Achaemenians, p. 254) Which is an opinion that is completely opposite to the opinion mentioned in the first part of the book Bridge to the Past ( A bridge to the past, p. Part I, p 34) Or like their claim that the Achaemenids, Parthians, and Sassanids were aliens and their achievements such as the destruction and halting of the growth of Iran and Mesopotamia ( The rise of the Achaemenians, p 223) Which is in complete contradiction with his speech in the Parthian book, which considers the Parthians to be the reason for the renewal of the life of the Middle East. . ( Parshanian, p. 221, 250 ، 252 )
These were just a handful of signs . I will speak about this again in the not too distant future . It is hoped that everyone will follow Mr. Porpirar's invitation to reflect on the foundations of Iran's history and, of course, stay away from prejudices and ethnic feelings. .
letter book :
1-Andalusi, a rising judge; definition of the classes of nations; Corrected by Gholamreza Jamshid Nejad I, Tehran : emigration, 1376 2- Porpirar, Nasser; Past bridge, first part, review of documents; Second edition, Tehran: Caring, 1380
3- Porpirar, Nasser; Twelve centuries of silence, Parthians; Tehran : Caring, 1381
4- Porpirar, Nasser, Twelve Centuries of Silence, Bramden Achaemenians, 4th edition, Tehran: Caring, 1381
5- Porpirar, Nasser; Twelve Centuries of Silence, Sasanian, Part I, First Edition, Singapore, 1383
6- Sultanzadeh, Hossein, History of Iranian schools from ancient times to the establishment of Dar al-Funun, Tehran: Agha, 1364

7- Mirjafari, Hossein, History of Timurids and Turkmens, 2nd edition, Tehran: Side, 1379

Read the second part

Read the third part

Read the fourth part

Source: Azargshansep website

A reflection on the basis of the history of Nasser Pourpirar's writings 1